2 ms·
I'm not really up in arms about OpenAIs decision, but I just don't want people to frame this as "why can't more companies release models like OpenAI does" when
by MiroF 6y ago
I'm not really up in arms about OpenAIs decision, but I just don't want people to frame this as "why can't more companies release models like OpenAI does" when in reality the opposite is pretty much true.
GPT-2 wasn't really feasible for most actors to train from scratch, otherwise it would have been released by a third party. GPT-3 is technically feasible for a single actor to do inference with, although not really really.
- tmabraham 6y agoI agree with your comment here but I think for the type and size of model, OpenAI has done the best they could with such large models. So I wouldn't say they've "regressed and refused to release its GPT models" they just had to take a different route with GPT models.
- tmabraham 6y agoPeople who disagree and are downvoting, may I ask why?