I accept your challenge, here's why my comments are relevant: - This post is front paged on HN, grabbing your attention, mine, and a demographic that skews lar

I accept your challenge, here's why my comments are relevant: - This post is front paged on HN, grabbing your attention, mine, and a demographic that skews largely to Apple's core corporate HR need and customer base. - It is important that the HN community can rely on the comments section to gain insight or nuance that they would not otherwise have from the source material. - The author works to harm Apple's reputation as an employer and company suggesting one stops buying their products and opt out of their ecosystem etc. - This central argument, that Apple is an unfair and malicious employer, is in conflict with Apple's objectively industry leading employee retention numbers that I share above. - The author never discloses that he is/was a retail employee vs. a corporate employee which I think anybody with an understanding of retail employment in general would appreciate to have as a filter to assess his pov. - Without taking a position of this termination being right or wrong, the evidence above suggests this is an edge-case and is probably not deserving of my or my fellow HN users taking into deep consideration in our opinion of Apple. - Instead it feels like a well timed piece of negative content that fits into a narrative that several very large and powerful corporations are working hard to try in the court of public opinion. (1) - - - And then back to your comment - what lesson or theme are you drawing from a single retail employees one-sided negative experience working within the Apple employee ecosystem? What am I missing? Why is this relevant? (1) https://www.theverge.com/2020/8/17/21372480/apple-epic-threat-developer-tools-agreement-unreal-engine-fortnite https://www.theverge.com/2020/8/17/21372480/apple-epic-threa...