4 ms·
> Some facts are so well stablished in human knowledge that there is not need to cite it. So, your statement is true because you say that it's common knowledge
by vzidex 6y ago
> Some facts are so well stablished in human knowledge that there is not need to cite it.
So, your statement is true because you say that it's common knowledge that it's true?
> Primary and secondary production, is a big fat chapter in any Ecology handbook
OK, then kindly provide one of these ecology handbooks that proves your point
> If nobody is trying to produce a natural sized cow sculpture made of vanille beans, there must be a reason
What do you even mean by this?
- pvaldes 6y ago> So your statement is true because you say that it's common knowledge that it's true? Not, my statement is true BECAUSE is has been proven extensively and is common knowledge that it's true. There is a difference. There are extensive databases, plots and tables about how many food you can expect to produce from each organism by unit of time and area. Is the basis of a main branch of ecology: Trophic chains and energy. To say than growing Soy is more efficient than to breed Polar bears is a repeated lie, trying to make simple things that aren't simple. Not. It depends on the ecosystem, context, temperature range, soil, and climate. And is the same with breeding cattle.