3 ms·
If the ~50% of Americans who choose not to vote, actually did, that would by definition change the politicians who are "able to win."
by all_usernames 6y ago
If the ~50% of Americans who choose not to vote, actually did, that would by definition change the politicians who are "able to win."
- sumtechguy 6y agoSomething I heard a long time ago is they basically 'are' voting. The vote is they do not care. I personally think it is a bad position to take, but it is not 'wrong'.
- nogabebop23 6y agocan't reply to the sibling but they are not voting "they don't care", they just plain don't care. If you do care but can't pick among the bad choices, you go through the actions and spoil your ballot or where applicable write in your choice. This is a lot of work for nothing beyond showing you care.
- twblalock 6y agoWhat makes you think those non-voters would vote in favor of policies to solve climate change? I bet each one of them would be just as likely to be a climate change skeptic as the Americans who currently vote.
- ajmurmann 6y agoHow many people aren't voting because they feel their vote doesn't count. I'm not a US citizen, but my wife is. She usually doesn't vote or only votes because I talk her into it. Her reasoning is that our state will be carried by a democrat anyways. It doesn't matter if they win by 51% or 100%. Between electoral college and first-past-the-post it's no wonder few people vote.
- e40 6y agoThat is sad beyond words and is the cause of the current state of things. It's probably how a lot of democrats think in red states.
- ajmurmann 6y agoWell, this is a very liberal in a very blue state
- jasonwatkinspdx 6y agoIt's a sadly common view. One thing I'd tell your wife is that down ticket races are very important, particularly state legislatures. I know my district will be carried by a dem, but that doesn't mean there aren't distinctions between which dem I want.