4 ms·
I think it’s hard to get people to vote for a tax that will take money they have already acquired away from them. Reducing their potential for future earnings s
by crispyporkbites 6y ago
I think it’s hard to get people to vote for a tax that will take money they have already acquired away from them. Reducing their potential for future earnings seems a lot more realistic to me.
- erichocean 6y agoMost countries phrase it like this: you owe 30% tax on a presumed 4% gain on your 100K. That's an identical amount to a 1.2% tax on 100K, but phrased in a way that I think meets your objections.