>What would have to happen for you to change your mind ? It's not about changing minds - it's about evidence. There's ample evidence BTC is simply repeating th

>What would have to happen for you to change your mind ? It's not about changing minds - it's about evidence. There's ample evidence BTC is simply repeating the flaws of discarded money systems, and they were discarded because they are terrible. Unless BTC addresses these flaws there is little sense in painting a pig. Mankind has learned that a money system that cannot adjust to shocks is a terrible idea. So first BTC needs this ability, which would make it not BTC. If it cannot at least meet minimum requirements, then it fails. You might as well argue we should trade tulip bulbs as currency if you're going to ignore modern evidence. The real question is why do you clutch BTC given centuries of evidence and widespread professional opinion that it fails at the things a money system needs to be modern? Why do you insist on repeating flaws that have been conclusively demonstrated to fail? I gave you ample phrases to google and learn from. If you still claim BTC is somehow immune from all its flaws that is your choice.