4 ms·
> there was a 10GB/user cap, so it's unlikely someone had been using it as their only copy I don't understand why a small total size implies people are less li
by jefftk 6y ago
> there was a 10GB/user cap, so it's unlikely someone had been using it as their only copy
I don't understand why a small total size implies people are less likely to use it for their only copy of something?
- tombert 6y agoI think because video and photos have the potential to be huge, especially in higher-end cameras, so it wouldn't take very long to exhaust 10gb of data, implying that they might be using a service that allows more for longer-term stuff (e.g. S3).