3 ms·
In the comment I was replying to, your first sentence was "Google profits from the content." How then is it not about whether Google is profitable or not? I am
by asdfasgasdgasdg 6y ago
In the comment I was replying to, your first sentence was "Google profits from the content." How then is it not about whether Google is profitable or not? I am contradicting your assertion that Google profits materially from this content. If Google removes the content and remains profitable, that strikes directly at your claim that Google profits from the content. It's not beside the point. It is exactly responsive to what you wrote. Maybe that is not the point you were trying to make, but IMO that is an issue with what wrote, not my understanding of it. The language you used was about profits, plain as day.
- clouddrover 6y ago> In the comment I was replying to, your first sentence was "Google profits from the content." Which is not the same as "Google is profitable." Good grief. This is about making sure journalism survives. Google bleeding it dry doesn't help it survive.