3 ms·
You’re doubtless right about that, and it’s the same defeatist principle that’s let capitalism survive as it long as it has (aside from the natural fact that it
by voidhorse 6y ago
You’re doubtless right about that, and it’s the same defeatist principle that’s let capitalism survive as it long as it has (aside from the natural fact that it concentrates power in such away that those that wield it are incentivized in keeping the structure in place).
Any empiricist can’t ignore the brash inequality of modern day late capitalism—thinking that, in spite of the many negative effects of this inequality, that it is simply “the best we can do” is in my mind a fallacy of affirming the present as the only possibility comparing it to failed regimes is also disingenuous in my opinion and a limited view of alternatives—we have novel ideas in play today, e.g UBi—the situation is not “capitalism or soviet era communism” as many capitalist apologists would have you believe.
- lend000 6y agoI suspect if you proposed a superior alternative instead of just decrying capitalism (which to me seems no different than saying 'cancer sucks!' and then leaving it at that), you might get more traction.