4 ms·
I think maybe the point of the parent comment, or at least the point that I see, is that there is benefit to the consumer in having things like trademarks be en
by billybob 16y ago
I think maybe the point of the parent comment, or at least the point that I see, is that there is benefit to the consumer in having things like trademarks be enforced.
Copyright and patents are intended to benefit the public by incentivizing creators to make more stuff. Whether that works is debatable.
But trademark is intended (or at least has the effect) of helping consumers identify a product's maker. If I buy an Acme Rocket Sled, it's because I've heard that Acme makes good ones. It sucks for me if I can never tell a real Acme from a fake one; I can't purchase with any confidence. And while maybe the blogosphere could help me find out where to get real Acmes, it really seems more efficient if we just outlaw making knockoffs and penalize those who do. If it's not Acme, I want it to have a different label.
- mhb 16y agoIt sure seems like the point was to take a gratuitous swipe at free market capitalism. And if it wasn't the lack of clarity regarding the actual target of the gratuitous swipe deserves at least a modicum of disapprobation.
- SoftwareMaven 16y agoThat is only true if you are if the mindset that there can be nothing wrong with unfettered, free-market capitalism. While it is certainly better than many other economic philosophies, it would be a mistake to pretend it is perfect.
- mhb 16y agoIt is also true if you prefer a reasoned argument to a gratuitous swipe.