4 ms·
I suspect you’d find that a single untrained human, even well-armed, isn’t always sufficient to kill a tiger. So rather than avenge your buddy and improve the
by macintux 6y ago
I suspect you’d find that a single untrained human, even well-armed, isn’t always sufficient to kill a tiger.
So rather than avenge your buddy and improve the tiger gene pool, you’d get killed too.
- swader999 6y agoFor grizzly bear attacks, bear mace is more effective than guns. https://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/spray-more-effective-than-guns-against-bears-study-1.707738 https://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/spray-more-effective-than...
- throwaway0a5e 6y agoYou don't have to get them every time just often enough that they stop doing it It's about making it statically much riskier for the tigers to misbehave, not saving everyone.
- macintux 6y agoPer https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiger_attack https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiger_attack the majority who attack humans are infirm and desperate. Doubt taking them out of the gene pool would do any long-term good.