Why not Chuck Schumer, who has been winning elections for 40 years without a loss? Clearly one should care about the fairness of the election process, not that

Why not Chuck Schumer, who has been winning elections for 40 years without a loss? Clearly one should care about the fairness of the election process, not that someone wins lots of elections. To say that winning multiple elections is the same as ending democracy is, as I said, an absurd take.