2 ms·
I agree, and was using the parent comment's also undefined term "good school". Socioeconomics don't have to be educational destiny however. In particular, a
by danans 6y ago
I agree, and was using the parent comment's also undefined term "good school". Socioeconomics don't have to be educational destiny however. In particular, a blue-collar community's school does not have to be a "bad school". I grew up in a largely blue collar (and notably, white) school system in a stable community that provided good educational opportunities to many students.
What was different there vs communities with "bad schools" was that we didn't face systemic deprivation and de-resourcing. This was a community with a significant (though waning) number of union jobs, and largely stable households. There were lots of problems, no doubt - including racism - but within the confines of the community, you didn't need to have professional educated parents in order to have chance at maximizing your educational potential.
- dragonwriter 6y ago> In particular, a blue-collar community's school does not have to be a "bad school". There's little evidence that they generally are, is my point. Once you control for individual factors that contribute to student success outside of the school they go to, there's very little evidence that differences between schools have much effect.