Sorry, I was replying to this: > The counter argument would be that git is the poster-child of poor UX, which could be blamed on the fact that it exposes too m

Sorry, I was replying to this: > The counter argument would be that git is the poster-child of poor UX, which could be blamed on the fact that it exposes too much of its internal data structure and general inner-workings to the user. I agree with you that the UI is inconsistent, however I don't agree that it's the result of git exposing too much of the internal data structure.