3 ms·
Agree. There is a reason why function names like exist. > gtk_app_chooser_widget_set_show_recommended > gtk_tree_model_filter_convert_child_iter_to_iter
by slezyr 6y ago
Agree. There is a reason why function names like exist.
> gtk_app_chooser_widget_set_show_recommended
> gtk_tree_model_filter_convert_child_iter_to_iter
- typon 6y agoI don't know how anyone can develop serious projects in C due to this exact reason.
- bzb4 6y agoPeople have been developing serious projects in C for decades, so it clearly works.
- ironmagma 6y agoFor limited and questionable definitions of “works,” yeah. There is a reason C++ is much more popular, and it’s not the exception handling.
- fsociety 6y agoMinimal dependencies is always the answer.
- typon 6y agoExcept it isn't because why would gtk need to prefix their functions and structs with these ugly names? Namespaces is the answer to solving problems arising from a lack of namespaces.
- OnlyOneCannolo 6y agoIt's really not that much different from anything else. gtk_app_chooser_widget_set_show_recommended gtk::app::chooser::widget::set_show_recommended gtk.app.chooser.widget.set_show_recommended