> That's implying that either the services would go, or they would no longer be free. No it's not ... it just implies they could be harmed (damaged, degraded).

> That's implying that either the services would go, or they would no longer be free. No it's not ... it just implies they could be harmed (damaged, degraded). For example as Google's letter goes on to explain in detail, things like "...Google Search results and YouTube will be worse for you". Google actually wrote these harms into their letter. To pretend an alternative interpretation is viable when they explicitly elaborated their meaning right after they wrote that sentence is highly misleading.