I think it's equally bizzare to say in (2)(e) that the platform must provide "information about how the registered news business corporation can gain access to

I think it's equally bizzare to say in (2)(e) that the platform must provide "information about how the registered news business corporation can gain access to the data" and not have a reasonable interpretation of that be that this means it is required to actually provide access to the data. At best it's horrifically badly worded - at worst, deliberately confusing, as if written by a lobbyist. I interpret (2)(a) to mean, "whether or not it [currently] shares the data". If the ACCC wanted this to be interpreted as they have written in their press release just now, perhaps they could try putting those words into the actual bill?