3 ms·
I doubt it's been stalled because the government still wanted to exploit it. I think it's rather them not wanting past use to be detected. You can't always sto
by est31 6y ago
I doubt it's been stalled because the government still wanted to exploit it. I think it's rather them not wanting past use to be detected.
You can't always stop using a 0 day. If the binary is deployed somewhere on a air gapped host computer that still receives updates, it's out of your hands. How can you be sure the update will get there while the binary is still on the computer? You risk detection which is very very bad when you run an APT. The tiny part of the campaign can make an entire country or even group of countries adopt stricter policies.
The government probably knows about enough holes to fix their malware promptly, but even if it does, it needs to "deploy" the fix all around the world otherwise it risks being noticed.
- Lammy 6y agoGrokking this doesn't make me okay with being a pawn in it by way of my choice of operating system :)
- CWuestefeld 6y agoThat doesn't seem to apply in this case. The vulnerability isn't masking the existence of the malware, it's only allowing its installer to run undetected (in some cases). Once the installer has done its job, they're golden. The vulnerability can be patched, but since the malware was already installed, it doesn't help the victim.