3 ms·
So the bottom of the linked article says 2016, which made me immediately think 'old!' It makes complete sense for the manifesto to be timestamped, but the surp
by willvarfar 6y ago
So the bottom of the linked article says 2016, which made me immediately think 'old!'
It makes complete sense for the manifesto to be timestamped, but the surprise was that I didn't realise I was reading the manifesto rather than this actually being the normal landing page... there's no title or anything and HN usually links to homepages.
But a quick glance at the forum and the homepage shows there's activity there still!
Clicking around, this seems really interesting :)
- TheUndead96 6y agoI felt that the manifesto gave the best description of the community. The homepage is mostly news about specific projects. I'm not directly affiliated with the group, but I follow some of the developers. And their podcast is pretty good too!
- coldtea 6y ago>So the bottom of the linked article says 2016, which made me immediately think 'old!' Only if you're 20-something or less. If you're 40 something, even 2000 is not "old".
- mrkeen 6y ago> So the bottom of the linked article says 2016, which made me immediately think 'old!' I yearn for the day when the industry reaches a state of reliability where we see "old" as a good thing, i.e. "this problem was solved ages ago!", rather than it seeming out-of-date. Probably not in my lifetime!