3 ms·
> Unless you're implying a set of companies are all in league with each other to reduce churn/competition for talent This is a proven reality, and has been out
by kkkiiiooo 6y ago
> Unless you're implying a set of companies are all in league with each other to reduce churn/competition for talent
This is a proven reality, and has been out in the open for a long time.
- BurningFrog 6y agoThen a few links to those proofs should be easy to produce?
- bretpiatt 6y agoOn this same thread https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24182126 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24182126
- BurningFrog 6y agoYeah, I know about that one. Wondered if anything new had come to light. This was 10 years ago and involved 8 companies. Concluding from one crime that they all do it, and that's just what those people are like, you can't trust them etc, is an impulse we all do well to resist. Of course, concluding that nothing like this will ever happen again is also naive. The incentive to cooperate is certainly still there. My impression is that since the 2010 case, wages have gone up dramatically in that class of companies. There are also more big companies with owners who aren't pals from before. I think. Just guessing, relly.