But what would be the point of saying that? It sounds like you have an implicit therefore of "life is risk, so there's nothing to be done". This touches on what

But what would be the point of saying that? It sounds like you have an implicit therefore of "life is risk, so there's nothing to be done". This touches on what I've noticed as a common logic flaw - reducing something to binary when it's the degree that matters. Yes, increased interactivity increases some sorts of risks (binary). But depending on the degree of that increased risk, we may wish to manage that somehow on a societal level. (For instance, in a post-COVID world, NFL teams could issue a non-mandated team-branded cloth mask on every seat in the winter months.)