3 ms·
My personal experience with hardware devices seem to be the opposite of most people's experiences. So many people buy a lot of hardware that does the same thing
by moth-fuzz 6y ago
My personal experience with hardware devices seem to be the opposite of most people's experiences. So many people buy a lot of hardware that does the same thing as (or less than) a computer simply to not use a computer at all costs - and cost it does! I spent a good chunk of money on a 2000xl expecting a radically different workflow, a paradigm shift, a more 'jammable' music-making experience, and I found that it was the exact same architecturally as working on the computer (or maschine if I want a tactile interface) except 10x slower technically and 40x slower mentally. Nothing was radically different, it was the same beats and bars as I was used to, except it was slower and less capable from a technical standpoint. I get that hardware works for many but for me it's just not so.
All that said I admire the 3000 for its sound capabilities - if they weren't so expensive I'd buy one just to resample masters into. But I guess that's what 'vintage' emulation plugins are for. And of course there's the historical pedigree - enabling the invention of genres and all that.
- metalgearsolid3 6y agoI own an MPC60 and IMO all the magic in it is with its workflow. To get one just for the sound should disappoint. However it's a nice bonus to be able to use its shitty pre amp as a distortion fx for my other gear.
- whatok 6y agoThe 2000XL is nearly 25 years old. No idea how recently you tried one but I can see someone familiar/comfortable with some sort of DAW workflow not being able to easily adjust to one. Just sample load time or dealing with floppies (or zip disks!) in 2020 is kind of a non-starter for me. That said, it's still very hard for me to write these things off when you can go on YouTube and see people create absolute magic.