This assumes that gender dysphoria is exclusively physiological, an impossibility given that gender itself is partially socially- and psychologically-constructe

This assumes that gender dysphoria is exclusively physiological, an impossibility given that gender itself is partially socially- and psychologically-constructed. As mentioned, perhaps hormone treatment could still benefit people who don't have a clinically-indicated deficiency solely because (even in men and women with functional gonads) their application enhances the secondary sexual characteristics (behavioral, psychological, and physical) that a dysphoric individual might find lacking. My personal take is that a good deal of dysphoria is misdiagnosed as dysmorphia. Because those people are left to self-medicate, unfortunately you end up with the kind of abuse that makes people question the legitimacy of such treatment. I think, though, it's dangerous to lump in people who could benefit from hormonal support for their exercise and antidepression goals (which, for some cis men, would be a gender affirmative strategy), with people who inject synthol or silicone without any medically-viable rationale and in so doing radically damage their bodies (which is what happens now). In the end, what I'm hoping to see someday is an understanding of a fundamental similarity between the cis and trans experiences, because it would mean both buy-in from and benefits for both groups.