3 ms·
> Unfortunately, giving the homeless homes doesn't work. For the economically disadvantaged, of course providing free or low cost housing is helpful and welcome
by DanBC 6y ago
> Unfortunately, giving the homeless homes doesn't work. For the economically disadvantaged, of course providing free or low cost housing is helpful and welcome.
> But for the majority, who have mental illness and/or substance abuse issues, a shelter or home often makes little difference.
I'd question your stats about mental illness and substance misuse disorder, but even if we accept that most homeless people are either mentally ill, or addicted, or both: how do you expect them to engage with treatment when they're living on the street?
"Homes first" is a key part of many homeless health programmes. See this example, called "housing first": https://hfe.homeless.org.uk/about-housing-first https://hfe.homeless.org.uk/about-housing-first
> is restoration of residential mental care facilities that were largely torn down in the 1970s in favor of mainstreaming the mentally ill.
We really really don't need to go back to the days of asylums that held people for many years for relatively mild mental ill health.
- jeffdn 6y agoWe don't want to go back to that, but the replacement of that system with a choice between homelessness or incarceration hasn't exactly been a success. There has to be a better way.
- biztos 6y agoThe link in the post you are replying to claims to be a better way. (I agree but I'm not an expert.)
- novok 6y ago%90 of homeless are not the chronic homeless, it's the ~%10 chronic that really need mental health care that are ruining it for everyone. The numbers are also very low, around 10k 'chronics' for the entire bay area as far as I remember. You need different solutions for different types. The poor / down on their luck types are definitely helped by free housing.