> Meaning that right now it isn't that way, right? Correct, the current spec doesn't allow that. But, as I said, I think that is something that could reasonabl

> Meaning that right now it isn't that way, right? Correct, the current spec doesn't allow that. But, as I said, I think that is something that could reasonably easily change if many sites wanted to publish with vanilla CSS and HTML. > For some reason everyone still seems to associate amp with Google, and the only times I can remember finding AMP pages are when I search with Google Google started the project, and is still by far the biggest contributor. But Bing also supports AMP, caching and serving AMP pages: https://www.bing.com/webmaster/help/bing-amp-cache-bc1c884c https://www.bing.com/webmaster/help/bing-amp-cache-bc1c884c