The word “impact” here is incredibly misleading, as most people would infer a causal relationship from that word, when the study and subtext are all about corre

The word “impact” here is incredibly misleading, as most people would infer a causal relationship from that word, when the study and subtext are all about correlation. I don’t think the science (As in the raw data and charts) is necessarily bad, but the title of the linked article (Which is not the title of the original article) is needlessly imprecise (Or precise in the wrong ways, I suppose).