> This is a ridiculous argument, It is most certainly not. It is the reason voter secrecy in considered a cornerstone of a legitimate public vote. There are w

> This is a ridiculous argument, It is most certainly not. It is the reason voter secrecy in considered a cornerstone of a legitimate public vote. There are whole organizations, like the OSCE Election Observation, who audit these sort of things internationally. > it could just as well apply to mail-in voting It does, very much so. Every mail-in voting has to take this into account. Any introductory political science course will touch on these things. Commonly this is done by way of a method to override or revoke votes. A mail-in voting system would be problematic if it was the only way to vote. This is the most common objection to electronic voting systems, that it's hard for them to stand on their own.