> Did you read the article to the end? This is an unnecessary jab that violates the guidelines on HN > Please don't comment on whether someone read an articl

> Did you read the article to the end? This is an unnecessary jab that violates the guidelines on HN > Please don't comment on whether someone read an article. "Did you even read the article? It mentions that" can be shortened to "The article mentions that." > RC also reached out to the author via e-mail, but didn't hear back until the second e-mail: You mean, the day that they kicked him out they first reached out via email and then zulip, and you somehow think that the author not having an extremely short turn around time on checking their email makes them more at fault? > Furthermore, apparently the author is the only person who has ever missed the orientation communications: To be clear, when you say the first person, you mean the first person since March 30th (when they started being remote) who both missed the communication and happened to be in a timezone where they weren't just naturally up at that time. I don't imagine that there have been a lot of people placed in this situation that you are comparing the author too.