3 ms·
The title says "spectrum," but a lazy read of the content could suggest that it is a dichotomy that is being described. The situation described by the author i
by arwhatever 6y ago
The title says "spectrum," but a lazy read of the content could suggest that it is a dichotomy that is being described.
The situation described by the author is definitely a spectrum, however. I currently find myself in a position that is a bit far for my liking toward the "VendorOps" end of the spectrum, and I find the name given to this spectrum by the author to be immensely useful.
I've previously defined the spectrum to myself as a "build vs buy" spectrum.
My current job is not exactly "VendorOps" in the complete sense described in the article, but it is a bit far in that direction along the spectrum for my liking, I write and architect code projects, I write unit tests, build and deploy it all within CI/CD pipelines that I myself have built and designed.
But it's all in the service of gluing 3rd party software and vendor implementations together, and I do most of this work myself, with little interaction or overlap with the one other developer that is employed full-time at our company.
Much of my previous experience building what I would describe as "Building Proper Software Projects Together With A Team." And I miss that, and will seek that out in future roles. And having a proper (and publicly defined) name for this concept will be immensely useful.
- tonyedgecombe 6y agoThe problem is having a proper and publicly defined name for the concept could piegon hole you. It might make it harder to escape in this world of hyper-specialism.