4 ms·
Responses like this are why organizations often choose to do nothing rather than improve. Just because they are improving future communications does not mean th
by morelisp 6y ago
Responses like this are why organizations often choose to do nothing rather than improve. Just because they are improving future communications does not mean their communication was inadequate or that this qualifies as an emergency.
- krisoft 6y agoIf it does not qualify as an emergency then why are they kicking them out? No second chances, no "this is your last and final warning" nothing. Would you willingly cause 6 week long holes in peoples lives over a simple misunderstanding?
- morelisp 6y ago"Emergency" is obviously in reference to an emergency causing the person to miss the meeting (examples: a car accident on the way to the meeting; a canceled flight that would otherwise have been on time; a fire at their domicile that morning). "I didn't read the documentation thoroughly" is regrettable, but not an emergency. Whether it is grounds for kicking the person out depends on the importance of the missed meeting (seemingly extremely), the due diligence of the organization (it seems this was the first person to miss the meeting under rules that have been in effect for months), and the cost of missing it for both parties (under no circumstances is it a "hole in people's live"; they are not sending people who miss the meeting to prison).