5 ms·

Proof for the curious: http://www.google.com/search?q=number+of+seconds+in+a+year+divided+by+(pi+*+10^7) http://www.google.com/search?q=number+of+seconds+in+a+y

• omh 16y ago
  I understand what you did, but the mathematician in me cringed at the word "proof" in that comment.
  • itsnotvalid 16y ago
    May be the word "fact" would be better to describe these kind of numbers.
  • jberryman 16y ago
    proof by googlization
  • guelo 16y ago
    That looked like a mathematically rigorous proof to me. What was wrong with it?
  • likpok 16y ago
    Proof by construction is perfectly valid, if usually too difficult to be useful.