As per the "$100 startup", one should drop the 20% of clients that take up 80% of your time, and focus the ones that are cost effective (noise-free profit). The

As per the "$100 startup", one should drop the 20% of clients that take up 80% of your time, and focus the ones that are cost effective (noise-free profit). They may have (or not) learned their lesson and gave a full refund and closed the door. As a precaution/suggestion, when I work on an app (a website is a different thing but the analogy remains), I take a backup not (just) at the EOD, but "every now and then". It could be something simple such as zipping the folder with the xcode project (and files-images-etc), screenshots every now and then, so my time is not completely wasted. Ghost does have shitty controls (and probably practices as the article implies), it cannot be that they "forgot" to limit the value of number X to >=2 by accident. It's the typical scummy practice so you slip, they catch you red-handed and then charge you it since you already got used to using 4+ accounts. On the other hand, the author is also a bit shady. He knows that the limit is 2, creates 4, gets the warning, DOES NOT get charged, and then nags about it. Tried to cheat and got caught by someone (equally) unethical?