3 ms·
The Ghost CEO did precisely the wrong thing. But anyone who has had to support thousands of customers can spot this customer as toxic. The irony here is that
by subpixel 6y ago
The Ghost CEO did precisely the wrong thing.
But anyone who has had to support thousands of customers can spot this customer as toxic.
The irony here is that the toxic customer gave the CEO the solution: restrict functionality so users don’t get surprised.
- csydas 6y agoI deal with our company's 500k+ customers - this tweet would have been a 5 minute email and maybe a slightly short term discount to resolve, perhaps a quick 'mea culpa, we weren't clear; how could we have made part of the TOS more visible for you?' and follow up with a request for input on which situations the customer feels shouldn't be subject to the fee increase (e.g., a temporary viral article as they mentioned) The article author's complaint barely registers for me as this is something I handle daily; I cannot even imagine the scale you're judging on if this is a toxic customer for you.
- nacs 6y agoAs someone who has and still run a SaaS product, I’m amazed at the number of HN people saying this is a toxic/bad customer. This is an incredibly low bar for “toxic”. Apparently for some here, making a post where he made a legitimate complaint made him toxic just because it’s on Twitter? Twitter has become a standard way for some people to communicate with companies or to vent frustrations whether you like it or not. Deal with it instead of calling them an “ahole”.
- csydas 6y agoWell I'm not sure if I consider the complaint legitimate (it legitimately is a complaint, but I'm not sure how valid it is ;) ) but I agree this is normal now. This is how people vent. A few minutes to just absorb the venting for something everyone complains about (pricing) goes a long way at very little cost