> If this was necessary, other website builders would be doing this I didn't said it was necessary, I've only said there are 2 ways to look at. > you are the

> If this was necessary, other website builders would be doing this I didn't said it was necessary, I've only said there are 2 ways to look at. > you are the same!! Again, something I didn't say. I said you are doing the same about the "vitrolic rage" response, not about deleting the site. CEO's actions were inappropriate and unprofessional, and I do not defend him here, it is unacceptable to delete client's content (and as I wrote in another comment under this post, it makes me feel uneasy as their client). What I'm saying is that this whole thing blew out of proportion and neither action justified the next one - the email didn't justify the outrage; the outrage didn't justify deleting content; deleting content didn't justify spreading hateful tweets.