4 ms·
There's no focused argument here. Mere polemic. > the evolutionary argument...rests of [sic] a big mistake about what nervous systems, immune systems, genetic
by JacksonGariety 6y ago
There's no focused argument here. Mere polemic.
> the evolutionary argument...rests of [sic] a big mistake about what nervous systems, immune systems, genetic regulatory nets, etc., evolve to do. This is not transmit information from one place to another, or be "flexible" in some abstract sense, but cause actions which enhance the fitness of the organism they happen to be in.
What reasons does the author have for maintaining these ideas? Naturally, none are given.
It's just a bunch of disconnected opinions.
- 082349872349872 6y agoThe reason for the first sentence quoted is the second sentence quoted. I, for one, am happy that my homeostatic regulatory nets have not evolved to "the edge of chaos." Is there something provocative about his thesis, that would require focused argument?