3 ms·
Exactly my point. Mozilla used a rational numbering scheme where the larger the change, the larger the increment, with full integers being reserved for major c
by causality0 6y ago
Exactly my point. Mozilla used a rational numbering scheme where the larger the change, the larger the increment, with full integers being reserved for major changes. Then Chrome started changing its integer every few weeks and Firefox upended its own scheme to keep from looking unfashionable.
- ansible 6y agoBetween auto-updates and the numbers changing very often, I'm not even slightly aware of the current version numbers for Chrome or Firefox.
- forgotpwd16 6y agoFor a rolling-release model like this a scheme could include the date released, e.g. Firefox 20.07.x which is also used by Linux distros. Right now version numbers are pretty useless.
- gspr 6y agoVersion numbers aren't useless. It's just that there's an insane fad going around that only the latest iteration of something is suppose to be used.