4 ms·
Sounds to me like what was mentioned by tyingq was described accurately: "Maybe I even skirted the rules a bit by sending him a free sample of my cool toy and
by bigiain 6y ago
Sounds to me like what was mentioned by tyingq was described accurately:
"Maybe I even skirted the rules a bit by sending him a free sample of my cool toy and some rough code samples. He took it well beyond what I could. I didn't ask for anything."
Certainly seems easy enough to argue complies with:
"send bloggers free products to review or give away in return for a mention in a blogpost"
If you don't ask for mentions in blogs, that Webmaster Blog post doesn't technically apply, right? There's gray area in choosing to send free samples to people you are pretty sure will mention/link to you in a blog post, but where you don't ask them to (or place any expectation on them to). So "skirting the rules a bit" sounds about right to me. There weren't "review units", they were "free gifts". No request or expectation of a "review".
- SyneRyder 6y agoI agree with you mostly, and I don't want to suggest that the OP did something particularly egregious. "Skirting the rules a bit" seems accurate to me. I'm nitpicking and playing devil's advocate here. That said, as far as ethics & free gifts, this is why politicians, journalists and businesses usually have rules about accepting free gifts, often requiring them to return the gifts or give them to charity instead. Here's a post on Journalism Ethics relating to accepting free gifts: https://ethics.journalists.org/topics/gifts-free-travel-and-other-perks/ https://ethics.journalists.org/topics/gifts-free-travel-and-...
- tyingq 6y agoThat's roughly where my head is. I don't feel guilty per se, but I am aware that my ranking isn't really "organic". I knew the value of backlinks and went after it in a very deliberate way.