> It could be true that this is the normal cycle of moving boxes from low-use to high-traffic areas, as claimed. Without transparency, it's hard to be sure. Ev

> It could be true that this is the normal cycle of moving boxes from low-use to high-traffic areas, as claimed. Without transparency, it's hard to be sure. Even if that's the true reason for this, this project (and any project that reduces USPS capacity or capabilities) needs to be delayed until after the election to avoid even the appearance of impropriety.