That article seems to be a weird mish-mash of 3-5 contradictory conspiracy theories. It rants a good long while about how various forces in various countries wa

That article seems to be a weird mish-mash of 3-5 contradictory conspiracy theories. It rants a good long while about how various forces in various countries want to take control of Lebanon etc through various means. Okay maybe it's true that they would want to do that, but how are any of these forces responsible for the local authorities keeping thousands of tons of explosives in a port warehouse for years, and then deciding to store some fireworks in there too, and then having somebody try to weld on the door of that warehouse? I mean, I don't even say "conspiracy theory" in a hostile way. It's not impossible that one of those is actually true. But if we're supposed to be convinced of any of them, how about if they at least pick one and stick to it, and then maybe provide something more solid than wild speculation about how/why it would have happened in that particular way? A few vague tweets by the Israeli PM that could mean pretty much anything doesn't prove much, nor does a claim by a source based in a country hostile to the US to have seen multiple US reconnaissance planes of an unspecified type in the area at some unspecified time and location and means of detection.