2 ms·
Point taken. I didn't mean to be trite. Fishing is nutritionally important, and economically important to a lot of people in the world. This shouldn't be measu
by netcan 6y ago
Point taken.
I didn't mean to be trite. Fishing is nutritionally important, and economically important to a lot of people in the world. This shouldn't be measured in gdp contribution. I also don't take the cultural element lightly. Fishing is culturally essential to many cultures and subcultures wherever there is water.
There is a reason fisheries are still one of the main diplomatic issues to this day.
Dollar amount is, on the other hand, meaningful in the ways that it is.
Oil & gas are "unsustainable" in the "considering that we live on this planet" sense... the same sense that many fishing industries are unsustainable. The environment would be significantly better off without them. But, it's only recently that we can even see ourselves living without oil and gas. Those mines and pipelines, leaks, coal coughs and refineries still power us. Energy touches all of us, a lot. Ocean fish... we eat them sometimes.
..and oceanic ecosystems are not something that we can destroy regardless of economics. It's morally wrong.