4 ms·
I completely agree where you're coming from however, in the case of Mozilla I believe that the reference is relevant. If you see that the company is producing
by monksy 6y ago
I completely agree where you're coming from however, in the case of Mozilla I believe that the reference is relevant.
If you see that the company is producing a good product that you're donating to support. Would the "customers" (supporters) want to support the time and cost associated with kicking out the CEO over personal+(believed to be) private activities? (Context: Brandon Eich donated 1k of his personal money to a conservative/anti-gay org, and an activist within mozilla found+escalated this and claimed hostile work environment, eventually got him removed)
If I was donating, I would be pissed to know that valuable time was wasted about that and the loss of talent of personal politics and disagreement.
- dang 6y agoI'm responding to the word "degenerate", which was name-calling and flamebait. I don't see any problem with the comment otherwise. I've taken out the word "activism" in my GP comment to make that clearer. Edit: "don't see any problem" does not mean I agree with the comment. It means I don't see any other place that it broke the site guidelines.
- micv 6y agoWhat part of being heavily opposed to homophobic organisation is degenerate in your opinion?
- dang 6y agoPlease don't start this again. HN is a site for curiosity, not repetition (https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&sort=byDate&type=comment&query=curiosity%20repetition%20by:dang https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&so...) and particularly not flamewars (https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html), which are the most destructive form of repetition. The GP should not have posted flamebait, and the repliers should not have taken the bait.
- schwartzworld 6y agolol, you brought it up.
- BrendanEich 6y agoNo one ever claimed hostile work environment. Where'd you get that? The L.A. Times published the CA state database of political donations >= $100 in size, activists searched it for known names. That was in 2012.
- monksy 6y agoHey Brenden! I mentioned this before and the claims were that you lost the "trust of the employees" infering that the work environment wasn't feasible. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23681475 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23681475 I think for a private action that's insane. But oh well.