4 ms·
I don't think drinking fish tank cleaner constitutes following his advice.
by jhawk28 6y ago
I don't think drinking fish tank cleaner constitutes following his advice.
- Covzire 6y agoMore Darwinism at work than anything, but there was also some suspicion she murdered him. I can't shake this feeling that, just like the lies we were told about masks in order to stop the public from gobbling them all up, like they did with toilet paper, we're being lied to the same way with HCQ in order to protect the supply for the non-peasant classes. On one side there is a shrill loud voice saying it's foolish to take it, it's less than useless, etc, and on the other side there are multiple studies showing it is/was useful if used in a particular way. I have little Karma to burn but do as you will.
- ghthor 6y agoI found a US patent that suggests HCQ can repair DNA damage from ionizing and non ionizing radiation. My hunch tells me that the government stockpiles it in case of an infrastructure attack uses cell towers to make people sick.
- ghthor 6y agoPretty good reason to keep a stockpile of it. https://patents.google.com/patent/US20050014785A1/en https://patents.google.com/patent/US20050014785A1/en
- squarefoot 6y agoNot directly for sure, and as another HNer wrote there's some Darwin involved. I didn't know there had been an investigation for possible murder, so thanks to all HNers who pointed it out. It seems however from the latest articles I could find that the murder suspicion has been dismissed and the man death ruled as an accident. What however is strange is that the couple worked both at John Deere, and the man was an engineer with a high degree of education, which doesn't seem that compatible with the level of stupidity needed to drink a fish tank cleaner. Unrelated, but looking around i found that the two once sued their employer for sex and age discrimination against the wife. https://www.leagle.com/decision/infdco20140721507 https://www.leagle.com/decision/infdco20140721507