> The answer is still the same, things need to evolve if it gives meaning and give improved user experience and value. I don't think critics disagree with this

> The answer is still the same, things need to evolve if it gives meaning and give improved user experience and value. I don't think critics disagree with this notion. Rather they disagree that the bloat gives meaning/improved user experience/value. It admits the existence of incompetence and perverse incentives. The latter seems like a natural consequence of profit-driven development when user satisfaction is only loosely and partially tied to profit.