Once again - they are not market dominant, they do not have the largest marketshare of phone users. This is false. > and are enforcing rules that do not have p

Once again - they are not market dominant, they do not have the largest marketshare of phone users. This is false. > and are enforcing rules that do not have political (as in citizens') legitimacy. This is basically saying to me "yea you're right, it isn't illegal, but I don't like it!!" They're charging for a service, there is nothing unfair about it. Frankly, it could be even higher. > Same goes for Amazon/Google: extracting rent from a market-dominant position should be illegal (it isn't) regardless of how that position was won. Google is a clear monopoly - they dominate the market. Amazon does not - Wal-Mart, Target, are all viable competitors. BestBuy, NewEgg, Ebay, etc.