4 ms·
> Actually, that's their argument for doing it. If AMP didn't exist I might be slightly more inclined to believe them.
by HumblyTossed 6y ago
> Actually, that's their argument for doing it.
If AMP didn't exist I might be slightly more inclined to believe them.
- mkl 6y agoThey have a plan for that, too, a proposed standard (SXG: Signed HTTP Exchanges, currently only supported in Chrome and derivatives) that lets them hide the fact that AMP is being used: https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2018/11/signed-exchanges https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2018/11/signed-exc... and more background: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/07/googles-amp-canonical-web-and-importance-web-standards-0 https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/07/googles-amp-canonical-...