3 ms·
Some real (understandable) ignorance about how the tech industry works in this article. There should be no expectation that Instagram ever deletes anything perm
by rco8786 6y ago
Some real (understandable) ignorance about how the tech industry works in this article. There should be no expectation that Instagram ever deletes anything permanently from their servers.
The bug was showing users photos that were internally marked as deleted. Not that the photos were not in fact removed from Instagrams servers.
- victords 6y ago> There should be no expectation that Instagram ever deletes anything permanently from their servers. No, there should be this expectation. If I have a photo of myself that I'm not comfortable being saved somewhere, there should be an expectation that when I delete this from a service, that service will actually delete it. The expectation should be that the service will do what it said, not that it hid everything very well.
- llarsson 6y agoThe GDPR and its right to be forgotten agrees with you. This is grounds for sending a strong message to Instagram for not doing what they are legally bound to doing.
- dboreham 6y agoUnfortunately this isn't how computer storahe works. This is why the military have acid baths for their disk drives.
- have_faith 6y agoIn this particular case they are actively not attempting to delete the image at all, a big difference.
- aoowii 6y agoUntrue, even on flash-based storage full deletion is possible. Here's an answer I pulled from reddit: If you are appropriately using TRIM the data will be obliterated when 'garbage collection' occurs -- forensics will not be able to recover deleted data. This is going to be largely dependent on your OS and Hardware, but if you confirm TRIM is working correctly in your setup, shortly after you permanently delete something (not recycle bin or trash) it will be gone for good. The answer is that simple. Supporting data: http://forensic.belkasoft.com/en/why-ssd-destroy-court-evidence http://forensic.belkasoft.com/en/why-ssd-destroy-court-evide... http://digitalforensicsmagazine.com/blogs/?p=271 http://digitalforensicsmagazine.com/blogs/?p=271 http://www.mcgoverngreene.com/advoedges/AE_pdfs/2011_pdfs/AE_nov-dec11.pdf http://www.mcgoverngreene.com/advoedges/AE_pdfs/2011_pdfs/AE... http://www.forensicswiki.org/wiki/Solid_State_Drive_(SSD)_Forensics http://www.forensicswiki.org/wiki/Solid_State_Drive_(SSD)_Fo... There's also this as a less reliable added measure: http://cmrr.ucsd.edu/people/Hughes/SecureErase.shtml http://cmrr.ucsd.edu/people/Hughes/SecureErase.shtml The main takeaway is that people vastly exaggerate how recoverable disks are, making any effort at all will stop 99.9% of hackers trying to recover data.
- rco8786 6y agoMaybe we'll get to that place someday, but that is a far cry from reality both in industry norms and regulations in place (and frankly, even regulations being discussed at this point)
- jacquesm 6y agoYou are several years out of touch with the regulatory environment. The GDPR is pretty clear about this sort of thing and if you do not actually delete data upon request but pretend you do that might not be construed to be an accident but willful. Your comments in this thread provide further evidence that this is in fact the case.
- rco8786 6y agoIt's also clear about how to request your data be deleted! Clicking delete in the instagram app does not constitute a request to be forgotten. The GDPR does not allow for your data to selectively be forgotten either. You can request that they forget all of you, but not individual pieces of data.
- jacquesm 6y agoThe 'right to be forgotten' and the GDPR data subject access, review, correct and delete rights are two completely different things. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_be_forgotten https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_be_forgotten vs https://gdpr-info.eu/art-7-gdpr/ https://gdpr-info.eu/art-7-gdpr/