Thanks for the feedback! You come across as being upset about something, but it's not clear why. > instead of replying to other's and pound some tangentially r

Thanks for the feedback! You come across as being upset about something, but it's not clear why. > instead of replying to other's and pound some tangentially related point that you see [sic] I'm trying to be kind by explaining this to you because as you said, "I don't understand," and it doesn't feel like you've read what I said to you in the previous post. The starting point I used was that I had been unclear and needed to consider other interpretations of your comment given your confusion. Maybe you could extend me that same courtesy and think about ways in which you might be misunderstanding! I'll simplify things again to see if that helps you out. It must be really confusing for you if you think that I'm replying to you with a comment which could be added to the top post instead of something which is only conceivable as a reply to you. 1. It is established that sleep dysfunctions cause short term dopamine disregulation and other imbalances, 2. This study links (spuriously) those imbalances and their associated behaviours to an increased desire for starting one's own business, 3. You commented referencing cocaine and other stimulants in a manner which was suggestive to me of a belief that they could heighten the imbalances referred to at 1 and 2, 4. I commented to observe that in individuals suffering from such imbalances, stimulants are often prescribed because of the paradoxical impact that they alleviate the symptoms by treating the imbalance. > It's just not really related to my comment. You are the only person in this thread discussing the impact of ingesting stimulants to either cause or extend the behaviours which the article discusses. Hope this makes sense now! :)