3 ms·
One could argue that it would be bad for the consumer since their subsidized divisions have zero incentive to improve. It's nearly impossible to beat a free off
by ckocagil 6y ago
One could argue that it would be bad for the consumer since their subsidized divisions have zero incentive to improve. It's nearly impossible to beat a free offering, so no competition will arise. Therefore innovation halts.
This is what Google's been doing for years. In a healthy market we could have incredible email providers, video hosting services, calendars and whatnot.