> Non-repairability is not planned obsolescence. You already acknowledged that 6 year old phones are obsolete. And you also claimed claimed that "only someone

> Non-repairability is not planned obsolescence. You already acknowledged that 6 year old phones are obsolete. And you also claimed claimed that "only someone who didn't work on Apple products" could possibly "buy into" [that's also a huge accusation, one you don't even bother to back up] the idea that Apple is a treadmill of increasingly crappy things. That is demonstrably wrong, yet also not worthy of you even acknowledging it. > that’s a technical challenge not a financial decision Proof for that? Nevermind, you just ignore your glaring errors, and demand more proof, as if you watched those videos fully, while dropping laughable claims like that casually.