3 ms·
Love the idea of rotating "managerial" or "lead" person in a small group. I'm on a small team within a larger organization that we support (in dev and tool usa
by tom_b 16y ago
Love the idea of rotating "managerial" or "lead" person in a small group.
I'm on a small team within a larger organization that we support (in dev and tool usage). A challenge for us is that people in the larger org are used to having a manager to route their requests to.
I may give a rotational approach a whirl. But right now, one of my primary roles is as s&!t umbrella and I don't want to overly burden my real producers.
- dude_abides 16y agoSo what he is essentially saying is, they're an anarcho-syndicalist commune, taking it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week, and all the decision of that officer must be approved at a bi-weekly meeting by a two-thirds majority.
- dugmartin 16y agoThere is some lovely muck over here.
- hdctambien 16y agoIs this getting downvoted because people didn't catch the Monty Python joke? Or because they didn't like this specific reference (but accept the parent's reference)?
- EricBerglund 16y agoIt might be because a movie reference that's relevant to the conversation at hand can be humorous, but a movie reference in response to another movie reference is just regurgitating a script. The child comment doesn't really add anything to the conversation other than "I saw that popular movie as well."
- billybob 16y agoMaybe because it's a misquote. It's "lovely filth." (Also, the committee only has to ratify the officer's decision with a simple majority in the case of purely internal affairs.) http://www.sacred-texts.com/neu/mphg/mphg.htm http://www.sacred-texts.com/neu/mphg/mphg.htm
- mikeryan 16y agoThis fits nicely with the study which shows that organizations are more efficient if people are promoted at random ;-) http://arxiv.org/abs/0907.0455 http://arxiv.org/abs/0907.0455